Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGraham, Heather E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-16T18:18:27Z
dc.date.available2009-09-16T18:18:27Z
dc.date.issued2009-09-16T18:18:27Z
dc.date.submittedJanuary 2009en_US
dc.identifier.otherDISS-10244en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/1692
dc.description.abstractUtilizing survey methodology, the four-factor model of organizational justice was assessed, including distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice, as well as their relationships with overall perceived and work-related stress. In addition to the hypothesized relationships of each justice dimension and stress, this study investigated the Justice Salience Hierarchy (JSH) as proposed by Greenberg (2004). Confirmatory factor analyses indicated a reasonable fit of the four-factor model of justice; however, using moderated sequential regression analyses, the overall findings indicated a lack of support for the JSH. Notably, negative relationships between justice and stress were demonstrated. Specifically, results demonstrated the strength of informational and interpersonal justices as indicators and potential antecedents to stress and suggest implications for interactional justice training for leaders.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipLopez, Nicoletteen_US
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherPsychologyen_US
dc.titleOrganizational Justice And Stress: An Investigationen_US
dc.typeM.S.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeChairLopez, Nicoletteen_US
dc.degree.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.degree.disciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.degree.grantorUniversity of Texas at Arlingtonen_US
dc.degree.levelmastersen_US
dc.degree.nameM.S.en_US
dc.identifier.externalLinkhttp://www.uta.edu/ra/real/editprofile.php?onlyview=1&pid=2102
dc.identifier.externalLinkDescriptionLink to Research Profiles


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record