ATTENTION: The works hosted here are being migrated to a new repository that will consolidate resources, improve discoverability, and better show UTA's research impact on the global community. We will update authors as the migration progresses. Please see MavMatrix for more information.
Show simple item record
dc.contributor.author | Price, Iya Khelm | |
dc.contributor.author | Witzel, Jeffrey | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-08-29T00:58:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-29T00:58:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10106/24565 | |
dc.description.abstract | Studies on relative clauses (RCs) in a number of languages have shown that object-extracted RCs (ORCs) are more difficult to process than subject-extracted RCs (SRCs). SRC-ORC processing asymmetry has been attributed to:
• Structural expectations (Levy, 2008)
• Memory-based integration effects (Gibson, 2000)
• RC subject vs. object extraction difficulty differences (Lin & Bever, 2006)
In many languages, word order differences between SRCs and ORCs make it difficult to test among these accounts. Russian allows SRCs and ORCs to have the same linear word order (with case-marking distinguishing between the RC types). | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Relative clauses | en_US |
dc.subject | Russian language | en_US |
dc.subject | Object-extracted relative clauses | en_US |
dc.subject | Subject-extracted relative clauses | en_US |
dc.title | Relative Clause Processing: Evidence from Russian | en_US |
dc.type | Presentation | en_US |
dc.publisher.department | Department of Linguistics and TESOL, University of Texas at Arlington. | en_US |
Files in this item
- Name:
- Price & Witzel 2014.pdf
- Size:
- 713.9Kb
- Format:
- PDF
- Description:
- PDF
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Show simple item record