dc.contributor.author | Levin, Joel R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Robinson, Daniel H. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-18T16:20:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-18T16:20:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 5-1-2003 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Published in Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 2(1):231-236, May 2003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1538 – 9472 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10106/26930 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this commentary, we offer a perspective on the problem of authors reporting and interpreting effect sizes in
the absence of formal statistical tests of their chanceness. The perspective reinforces our previous distinction
between single -study investigations and multiple -study syntheses. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | DigitalCommons@WayneState | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wayne State University Press | en_US |
dc.subject | Effect sizes | en_US |
dc.subject | Statistical tests | en_US |
dc.subject | Single -study -- Investigations | en_US |
dc.subject | Multiple -study -- Syntheses | en_US |
dc.title | The Trouble With Interpreting Statistically Nonsignificant Effect Sizes in Single-Study Investigations | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.publisher.department | Department of Curriculum and Instruction, The University of Texas at Arlington | en_US |
dc.identifier.externalLink | http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/jmasm/vol2/iss1/23 | |
dc.identifier.externalLinkDescription | The original publication is available at Article DOI | en_US |
dc.identifier.externalLinkDescription | The original publication is available at the journal homepage | en_US |
dc.rights.license | Published open access through Digital Commons@WayneState | |
dc.identifier.doi | DOI: 10.22237/jmasm/1051748580 | |